Comments on: Landlording 101- Indiana’s 45-Day Letter Rules http://www.askmattonline.com/real-estate/landlording-101-indianas-45-day-letter-rules/ Empowering Business Owners & Real Estate Investors With Knowledge Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:08:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Matt http://www.askmattonline.com/real-estate/landlording-101-indianas-45-day-letter-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1609 Matt Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:58:55 +0000 http://www.askmattonline.com/?p=952#comment-1609 That's sad that judges are ruling in that way. That's not how the law reads. Your advice is good. Another option is to send via "Delivery Confirmation," which shows that the USPS delivered. There are situations where the mailman cannot get a signature on a certified mailing. Delivery Confimation handles that. That’s sad that judges are ruling in that way. That’s not how the law reads.

Your advice is good.

Another option is to send via “Delivery Confirmation,” which shows that the USPS delivered. There are situations where the mailman cannot get a signature on a certified mailing. Delivery Confimation handles that.

]]> By: Adam http://www.askmattonline.com/real-estate/landlording-101-indianas-45-day-letter-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-1608 Adam Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:50:55 +0000 http://www.askmattonline.com/?p=952#comment-1608 I've also been advised by fellow IN LLs to send the notice certified mail so that you have proof it was actually sent. Apparently, some judges have ruled in favor of tenants due to the LL not having anything from the post office/mail carrier showing the item was actually sent. I’ve also been advised by fellow IN LLs to send the notice certified mail so that you have proof it was actually sent. Apparently, some judges have ruled in favor of tenants due to the LL not having anything from the post office/mail carrier showing the item was actually sent.

]]>